Prediction of Patrick Zahraj [276th] vs Raphael Baltensperger [900th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L W L L W
Form
L L W W W L L W W LHead To Head: Zahraj 1 - 0 Baltensperger
They have played 2 sets in total, with Zahraj winning 2 and Baltensperger winning 0. The last match between Zahraj and Baltensperger was at the M25 Klosters, 20-06-2021, Q1 round, Clay with Patrick Zahraj getting the victory 6-0 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Patrick Zahraj | 1 |
| Raphael Baltensperger | 0 |
| Zahraj | Stats | Baltensperger |
|---|---|---|
| 63% (19-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 276 | Ranking | 900 |
| 272 | Highest Rank | 676 |
| 25 | Age | 27 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 58% (131-93) | Career Total W/L | 55% (128-104) |
| $3,650 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Zahraj VS Baltensperger H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-4 |
Stats 
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Raphael Baltensperger
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
Zahraj VS Baltensperger H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:13:0 | Average Match Time | 1:13:0 |
| 65% (32/49) | 1st Serve % | 62% (33/53) |
| 78% (25/32) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (17/33) |
| 47% (8/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (7/20) |
| 83% (5/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 55% (29/53) | Return Points Win % | 33% (16/49) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Patrick Zahraj vs Raphael Baltensperger Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Zahraj 1 - 0 Baltensperger
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zahraj has won 42.14% of points on their second serve, while Baltensperger has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zahraj, in recent form, has won 50.4% of their opponent's second serve points, while Baltensperger has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.51% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zahraj has saved 53.52% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Baltensperger has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zahraj has won 59.52% of matches played (W/L 50/ 34), with Baltensperger winning 66.67% (W/L 2/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zahraj has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 65% (W/L 41/ 22), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 19/ 17). Baltensperger has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 64% (W/L 23/ 13), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 48/ 49).
- Player level: In the last year, Zahraj has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.7% of matches (W/L 29/ 18), where as Baltensperger has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 2/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zahraj winning 1 times and Baltensperger being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Zahraj winning 2 and Baltensperger winning 0. The last match between Zahraj and Baltensperger was at the M25 Klosters, 20-06-2021, Q1 round, Clay with Patrick Zahraj getting the victory 6-0 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:13:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zahraj and Baltensperger have played a deciding set 0 times, with Zahraj winning 0 times and Baltensperger 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Zahraj winning 0, and Baltensperger 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zahraj has played against opponents with an average rank of 175.18 while Baltensperger has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zahraj has won 68% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Baltensperger has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zahraj has converted 33.99% of breakpoint opportunities, and Baltensperger has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Patrick Zahraj Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Alvin Nicholas Tudorica
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Patrick Zahraj
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
40%
(
26 of
65)
6
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
7
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
20 of
26)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Patrick Zahraj
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
35 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
68
|
6-7(5) 5-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Felix Corwin
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jelle Sels
Player
Patrick Zahraj
73%
(
74 of
101)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
90)
8
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
100
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 6-7(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Arthur Fery
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Mae Malige
63%
(
69 of
110)
1st Serve %
60%
(
51 of
85)
7
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
44%
(
48 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
100
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Alexey Vatutin
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Patrick Zahraj
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Maxence Beauge
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
55 of
81)
8
Aces
11
5
Double Faults
2
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
43 of
55)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
20 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
24 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(2) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Raphael Baltensperger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Dylan Dietrich
Player
Raphael Baltensperger
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve %
42%
(
19 of
45)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
7
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Raphael Baltensperger
Player
Tanguy Genier
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
2
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
2
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
32%
(
27 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
25 of
78)
82
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 4-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Raphael Baltensperger
Player
Ying Hou
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
3-6 6-2 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Edouard Aubert
Player
Raphael Baltensperger
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
45%
(
28 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Toby Alex Kodat
Player
Raphael Baltensperger
63%
(
65 of
104)
1st Serve %
64%
(
76 of
118)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
10
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
47 of
76)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
21%
(
4 of
19)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
42 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
52 of
118)
114
Total Points Won
108
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raphael Baltensperger
Player
Nicolas Kobelt
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve %
47%
(
39 of
83)
3
Aces
5
12
Double Faults
6
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
14 of
44)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
42%
(
42 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
83)
98
Total Points Won
84
|
5-7 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Raphael Baltensperger
Player
Niklas Koch
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Raphael Baltensperger
Player
Maurus Malgiaritta
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
27 of
53)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Raphael Baltensperger
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(2) 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
view more
Where To Watch Zahraj vs Baltensperger?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Zahraj Vs Baltensperger is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (131/93) | Win/Loss | 55% (128/104) |
| 57% (289/216) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (286/249) |
| 53% (2541/2256) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (2543/2395) |
| 0.32 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 750 | Aces Total | 381 |
| 0.36 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 844 | Total Double Faults | 643 |
| 1:27:4 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 150.75 | Average Opponent Rank | 174.88 |
| 62% (7620/12281) | 1st Serve % | 60% (6089/10230) |
| 68% (5203/7620) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (4084/6089) |
| 45% (2079/4661) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (1895/4141) |
| 43% (600/1389) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (452/965) |
| 42% (5314/12518) | Return Points Win % | 40% (3971/9907) |
| 59% (130/220) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (124/225) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 55% (32/58) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (26/47) |
| 54% (33/61) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (42/74) |
| 87% (129/112) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (127/106) |
| 12% (129/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (127/21) |
| 20% (95/19) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (105/22) |
See recent tennis photos of Zahraj and Baltensperger
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
